The Supreme Court waives off entertainment tax on musical events happening in Gujarat, be they for commercial or educational purposes.
The Supreme Court recently declared that musical programmes in Gujarat will not be liable to pay entertainment tax, even if a programme is being held for commercial and profit-generating purposes. The apex court contradicted the Gujarat High Court’s former understanding of Section 3A of the Gujarat Entertainments Tax Act, in the case Gypsy Pegasus Ltd. Vs. State of Gujarat.
A three-judge bench comprising Justice Ranjan Gogoi, Justice R Banumathi and Justice Navin Sinha supervised the proceedings. According to a TOI article, during an Arijit Singh concert on December 24, 2016, the organisers incurred a sum Rs 3.68 crore from ticket sales, against which they were liable to pay a tax amount of Rs 92 Lakh. The article states that ‘According to a government notification, 17% entertainment tax is levied for shows like these, based on the number of tickets sold.’ The organisers appealed to the court to waive this tax notice.
If a musical concert is organised in a “commercial manner and for profit making and which has no element of educational, medical, charitable, philanthropic or such other purposes, (they) are not entitled to exemption from payment of entertainment tax […].” The High Court refused to accept the petitioners’ claim that “for all the activities/entertainment mentioned in Schedule III irrespective of whether they are performed for any educational, medical, charitable, philanthropic or such other purposes or irrespective of fact whether they are performed for commercial purpose or not and/or there is a commercial element on such activities/entertainment, they shall be exempted from payment of entertainment tax […].”
The High Court then dismissed the Writ Petition.
However, the Supreme Court stated in its verdict that “The High Court could not have imposed the requirement of the entertainment to be for educational, cultural or charitable purpose when the form of entertainment in question is included in Schedule III to the Act.” The first item in Schedule III is “All kinds of musical programmes including musical nights and opera.”
The apex court then set aside the High Court order.
Although this sounds like great news for musical event organisers, Anushree Rauta of IPRMENTLAW states that this decision by the Supreme Court might not make a big difference to organisers as the entertainment tax is now ‘subsumed under GST’. The organisers confirm that the government can procure 28% GST on all musical concerts. The only real beneficiaries would be entities who have pending cases and/or liability with entertainment tax department from dates before GST came into place.
Oct 1, 2016
Banksy Banksyis a revolution or should we call him a phenomenon? One of the leading front men of his generation, he has transformed what it means to work in the Public domain.Banksy’sartistic practice is characterized by the perceptive use of…
Jun 18, 2016
An educational institution that rises above schooling(as we know it today), competition and degrees, Gurukulam follows the ancient Jaina education system of India where knowledge, understanding habits, sensitivity and logic is still considered superior. The Gurukulas are Indian schools that still…
Jun 3, 2016
“Hurrian Hymn No.6” is the oldest known written music piece, discovered so far. This origin of this piece dates back to 3400 years back in Bronze Age. It was engraved by Syrians on a clay slab. Even the origins of…